*这是由Google Adsense推荐的一个广告,并不代表本站的观点。

目前高产似母猪呢

现在我们来看看Hostker

Hostker是国人的主机商

站内直通车https://hostker.com

这个链接可以https://i.hostker.com/flag/13723得个5RMB

它有香港的,日本的,英国的,荷兰的,美国的,还有德国的服务器

可谓是非常多了....

目前我们只是用香港服务器

到后面评测就用香港,日本和美国的服务器

注册比较简单,因为是国人的,绑定个手机号,付10RMB就行了~

香港服务器评测

首先我们先新建一个香港服务器

我这次主要是评测香港一区和香港三区的

因为它上面写着:香港一区:三线CN2;香港三区:HKT线路

香港一区的最低配置是

1核 1G内存 25G硬盘 0.009人民币/小时 3M带宽 (≈64元/月)

香港三区的最低配置是

1核 2G内存 30G硬盘 0.010K贝壳/小时 3M带宽 (≈72元/月)

香港一区评测

电信去程走的CN2 GIA

移动是pccw

联通是直连

电信回程是CN2 GIA

[root@hostker ~]# traceroute 122.245.219.11
traceroute to 122.245.219.11 (122.245.219.11), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  gateway (154.209.235.1)  7.937 ms  9.001 ms  9.788 ms
 2  10.3.103.17 (10.3.103.17)  1.822 ms  1.804 ms  1.881 ms
 3  118.184.22.9 (118.184.22.9)  1.689 ms 118.184.22.118 (118.184.22.118)  1.607 ms  1.583 ms
 4  59.43.248.113 (59.43.248.113)  1.596 ms 59.43.247.17 (59.43.247.17)  1.500 ms 59.43.247.21 (59.43.247.21)  1.499 ms
 5  59.43.248.109 (59.43.248.109)  27.245 ms 59.43.248.237 (59.43.248.237)  61.557 ms 59.43.183.77 (59.43.183.77)  29.735 ms
 6  59.43.187.69 (59.43.187.69)  27.488 ms 59.43.246.189 (59.43.246.189)  25.441 ms *
 7  59.43.138.53 (59.43.138.53)  33.166 ms 59.43.130.213 (59.43.130.213)  28.912 ms 59.43.138.57 (59.43.138.57)  28.921 ms
 8  59.43.47.90 (59.43.47.90)  32.670 ms 59.43.47.94 (59.43.47.94)  34.565 ms 59.43.47.90 (59.43.47.90)  32.606 ms
 9  59.43.25.22 (59.43.25.22)  34.775 ms 59.43.117.178 (59.43.117.178)  38.228 ms 59.43.117.174 (59.43.117.174)  32.156 ms
10  * * *
11  * * *
12  122.245.219.11 (122.245.219.11)  168.126 ms  171.286 ms  166.947 ms
[root@hostker ~]# 

联通是直连

[root@hostker ~]# traceroute 112.85.231.129
traceroute to 112.85.231.129 (112.85.231.129), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  gateway (154.209.235.1)  6.143 ms  6.599 ms  7.050 ms
 2  10.3.103.25 (10.3.103.25)  1.758 ms  1.821 ms  1.895 ms
 3  118.184.22.89 (118.184.22.89)  1.461 ms  1.493 ms  1.457 ms
 4  hu0-0-0-2.cwc1hk.chinaunicomglobal.com (43.252.86.185)  2.434 ms 162.245.124.21 (162.245.124.21)  4.589 ms 162.245.124.17 (162.245.124.17)  2.277 ms
 5  202.77.23.29 (202.77.23.29)  6.846 ms 43.252.86.66 (43.252.86.66)  8.638 ms 202.77.23.29 (202.77.23.29)  6.763 ms
 6  202.77.23.29 (202.77.23.29)  6.723 ms 219.158.10.29 (219.158.10.29)  12.275 ms 202.77.23.29 (202.77.23.29)  5.414 ms
 7  219.158.103.29 (219.158.103.29)  12.757 ms 219.158.10.29 (219.158.10.29)  11.999 ms 219.158.103.29 (219.158.103.29)  12.642 ms
 8  219.158.8.117 (219.158.8.117)  10.798 ms  18.005 ms 219.158.103.29 (219.158.103.29)  11.865 ms
 9  219.158.12.2 (219.158.12.2)  34.659 ms  34.620 ms 219.158.8.117 (219.158.8.117)  15.068 ms
10  112.85.230.106 (112.85.230.106)  41.116 ms 219.158.12.2 (219.158.12.2)  37.904 ms  37.906 ms
11  112.85.230.106 (112.85.230.106)  167.492 ms  168.377 ms  168.603 ms
12  * * *
13  112.85.218.150 (112.85.218.150)  172.516 ms  172.639 ms  172.631 ms

移动是普通路线

[root@hostker ~]# traceroute 120.195.6.129
traceroute to 120.195.6.129 (120.195.6.129), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  gateway (154.209.235.1)  5.953 ms  6.365 ms  5.326 ms
 2  10.3.103.17 (10.3.103.17)  1.480 ms  1.476 ms  1.558 ms
 3  10.3.102.2 (10.3.102.2)  2.921 ms  3.293 ms  3.399 ms
 4  45.192.191.13 (45.192.191.13)  1.956 ms  2.241 ms  2.226 ms
 5  223.120.2.117 (223.120.2.117)  3.625 ms  1.870 ms  3.599 ms
 6  223.120.2.86 (223.120.2.86)  6.112 ms 223.120.2.78 (223.120.2.78)  6.107 ms 223.120.2.102 (223.120.2.102)  6.590 ms
 7  223.120.22.9 (223.120.22.9)  34.241 ms  35.762 ms  36.087 ms
 8  221.183.55.42 (221.183.55.42)  34.659 ms 221.183.55.46 (221.183.55.46)  35.286 ms  34.987 ms
 9  221.183.25.193 (221.183.25.193)  46.889 ms 221.183.25.189 (221.183.25.189)  46.574 ms *
10  221.176.20.69 (221.176.20.69)  57.484 ms 221.176.20.89 (221.176.20.89)  152.518 ms *
11  221.183.18.26 (221.183.18.26)  52.831 ms 221.183.14.38 (221.183.14.38)  50.467 ms 221.183.18.30 (221.183.18.30)  50.877 ms
12  221.183.54.133 (221.183.54.133)  167.132 ms 221.183.15.197 (221.183.15.197)  167.377 ms 221.183.54.125 (221.183.54.125)  166.789 ms
13  221.176.22.45 (221.176.22.45)  165.700 ms  182.071 ms  165.474 ms
14  221.183.14.38 (221.183.14.38)  167.749 ms 221.183.18.26 (221.183.18.26)  170.845 ms  167.688 ms
15  142.29.207.183.static.js.chinamobile.com (183.207.29.142)  185.750 ms  186.107 ms 234.21.207.183.static.js.chinamobile.com (183.207.21.234)  186.043 ms
16  120.195.42.122 (120.195.42.122)  182.152 ms  185.222 ms  181.435 ms
17  120.195.42.130 (120.195.42.130)  181.231 ms  181.636 ms  185.357 ms

电信双程CN2 GIA。移动去程pccw,回程普通路线,联通直连

下面是hostker的硬件配置

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU 型号             : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
CPU 核心数           : 1
CPU 频率             : 2267.034 MHz
总硬盘大小           : 25.0 GB (1.3 GB Used)
总内存大小           : 968 MB (150 MB Used)
SWAP大小             : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
开机时长             : 0 days, 0 hour 12 min
系统负载             : 1.15, 0.26, 0.09
系统                 : CentOS 7.4.1708
架构                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
内核                 : 3.10.0-693.21.1.el7.x86_64
虚拟化平台           : kvm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
硬盘I/O (第一次测试) : 53.7 MB/s
硬盘I/O (第二次测试) : 61.8 MB/s
硬盘I/O (第三次测试) : 62.7 MB/s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
节点名称                  IP地址            下载速度            延迟      
CacheFly                  204.93.150.152    1.12MB/s            36.348 ms   
Linode, Tokyo, JP                                                ms         
Linode, Singapore, SG     139.162.23.4      1.12MB/s            37.816 ms   
Linode, London, UK        176.58.107.39     1.11MB/s            228.054 ms  
Linode, Frankfurt, DE     139.162.130.8     1.11MB/s            197.687 ms  
Linode, Fremont, CA       50.116.14.9       1.12MB/s            152.000 ms  
Softlayer, Dallas, TX     173.192.68.18     1.11MB/s            184.220 ms  
Softlayer, Seattle, WA    67.228.112.250    1.06MB/s            131.101 ms  
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE  159.122.69.4      1.06MB/s            190.849 ms  
Softlayer, Singapore, SG  119.81.28.170     1.12MB/s            32.837 ms   
Softlayer, HongKong, CN   119.81.130.170    1.12MB/s            1.930 ms    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
节点名称                  上传速度          下载速度            延迟      
上海电信                  2.54 Mbit/s       8.52 Mbit/s         106.835 ms 
西安电信                  2.58 Mbit/s       7.09 Mbit/s         136.816 ms 
北京联通                  2.56 Mbit/s       8.59 Mbit/s         134.025 ms 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
合肥        : 42.31 ms   北京        : 44.64 ms   武汉        : 37.47 ms   
昌吉        : Fail       成都        : Fail       上海        : Fail       
太原        : 158.24 ms  杭州        : 39.57 ms   宁夏        : 50.52 ms   
呼和浩特    : 64.26 ms   南昌        : Fail       拉萨        : Fail       
乌鲁木齐    : 107.61 ms  天津        : 57.69 ms   襄阳        : Fail       
郑州        : 39.02 ms   沈阳        : Fail       兰州        : Fail       
哈尔滨      : Fail       宁波        : Fail       苏州        : Fail       
济南        : 41.61 ms   西安        : 36.96 ms   西宁        : Fail       
重庆        : 91.29 ms   深圳        : Fail       南京        : Fail       
长沙        : Fail       长春        : 54.47 ms   福州        : 22.85 ms   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

硬盘比三区渣

速度可以

Hostker香港一区Ping的速度的确比三区快很多

附一组我本地ping的数据(宁波电信中午)

C:\Users\21048>ping 154.209.235.19

正在 Ping 154.209.235.19 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 154.209.235.19 的回复: 字节=32 时间=61ms TTL=52
来自 154.209.235.19 的回复: 字节=32 时间=81ms TTL=52
来自 154.209.235.19 的回复: 字节=32 时间=46ms TTL=52
来自 154.209.235.19 的回复: 字节=32 时间=62ms TTL=52

154.209.235.19 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 46ms,最长 = 81ms,平均 = 62ms

C:\Users\21048>

下面是Hostker的UnixBench成绩

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Mar 27 2020 12:12:34 - 12:42:41
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       24191982.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3101.5 MWIPS (9.7 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1667.7 lps   (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        182419.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           46965.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        559480.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              254228.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  67332.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               5153.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2574.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    345.7 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         234793.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   24191982.7   2073.0
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3101.5    563.9
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1667.7    387.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     182419.7    460.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      46965.3    283.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     559480.3    964.6
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     254228.6    204.4
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      67332.9    168.3
Process Creation                                126.0       5153.4    409.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2574.9    607.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        345.7    576.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     234793.3    156.5
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         433.5



======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

433分,跑分过于垃圾!!!!

下面是没有安装b b r的速度

2Mbps,可以

下面是安装了b b r的速度

差不多

下面是观看YT的速度

看这个,我都不敢用代理了

香港三区评测

电信去程走的CN2 GIA

移动是直连

联通也是直连

Ping测试

基本上全绿,香港地区优势

附一组我在宁波电信早上ping的结果

C:\Users\21048>ping 185.207.155.184

正在 Ping 185.207.155.184 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 185.207.155.184 的回复: 字节=32 时间=38ms TTL=50
来自 185.207.155.184 的回复: 字节=32 时间=38ms TTL=50
来自 185.207.155.184 的回复: 字节=32 时间=38ms TTL=50
来自 185.207.155.184 的回复: 字节=32 时间=38ms TTL=50

185.207.155.184 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 38ms,最长 = 38ms,平均 = 38ms

C:\Users\21048>

下面是Hostker的硬件

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU 型号             : Common KVM processor
CPU 核心数           : 1
CPU 频率             : 2799.998 MHz
总硬盘大小           : 30.0 GB (0.8 GB Used)
总内存大小           : 2005 MB (255 MB Used)
SWAP大小             : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
开机时长             : 0 days, 0 hour 12 min
系统负载             : 0.20, 0.05, 0.01
系统                 : CentOS 6.10
架构                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
内核                 : 2.6.32-754.11.1.el6.x86_64
虚拟化平台           : kvm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
硬盘I/O (第一次测试) : 160 MB/s
硬盘I/O (第二次测试) : 386 MB/s
硬盘I/O (第三次测试) : 344 MB/s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
节点名称                  IP地址            下载速度            延迟      
CacheFly                  205.234.175.175   8.38MB/s            155.672 ms  
Linode, Tokyo, JP                                                ms         
Linode, Singapore, SG     139.162.23.4      8.64MB/s            32.979 ms   
Linode, London, UK        176.58.107.39     3.13MB/s            270.025 ms  
Linode, Frankfurt, DE     139.162.130.8     4.09MB/s            210.572 ms  
Linode, Fremont, CA       50.116.14.9       5.63MB/s            154.585 ms  
Softlayer, Dallas, TX     173.192.68.18     1.58MB/s            171.282 ms  
Softlayer, Seattle, WA    67.228.112.250    1.58MB/s            162.844 ms  
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE  159.122.69.4      1.75MB/s            194.355 ms  
Softlayer, Singapore, SG  119.81.28.170     1.31MB/s            35.257 ms   
Softlayer, HongKong, CN   119.81.130.170    8.89MB/s            3.630 ms    
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
节点名称                  上传速度          下载速度            延迟      
上海电信                  0.10 Mbit/s       18.78 Mbit/s        294.165 ms 
西安电信                  3.18 Mbit/s       56.00 Mbit/s        64.887 ms  
北京联通                  3.21 Mbit/s       84.43 Mbit/s        67.201 ms  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
合肥        : 63.13 ms   北京        : 43.04 ms   武汉        : 79.17 ms   
昌吉        : Fail       成都        : Fail       上海        : Fail       
太原        : 160.48 ms  杭州        : 34.42 ms   宁夏        : 55.01 ms   
呼和浩特    : 64.44 ms   南昌        : Fail       拉萨        : Fail       
乌鲁木齐    : 98.81 ms   天津        : 41.33 ms   襄阳        : Fail       
郑州        : 37.36 ms   沈阳        : Fail       兰州        : Fail       
哈尔滨      : Fail       宁波        : Fail       苏州        : Fail       
济南        : 43.55 ms   西安        : 44.32 ms   西宁        : Fail       
重庆        : 91.41 ms   深圳        : Fail       南京        : Fail       
长沙        : Fail       长春        : 50.29 ms   福州        : 26.32 ms   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

看起来是SSD盘子

速度可以

下面是回程测试

这是联通的回程

[root@Cloud ~]# traceroute 112.85.231.129
traceroute to 112.85.231.129 (112.85.231.129), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  185.207.154.1 (185.207.154.1)  0.821 ms  0.772 ms  0.752 ms
 2  10.84.1.254 (10.84.1.254)  0.748 ms  0.721 ms  0.762 ms
 3  10.10.11.254 (10.10.11.254)  2.202 ms  2.202 ms  2.185 ms
 4  43.252.86.113 (43.252.86.113)  2.214 ms  2.227 ms  2.228 ms
 5  119.252.139.69 (119.252.139.69)  2.432 ms  2.466 ms  2.419 ms
 6  43.252.86.66 (43.252.86.66)  5.804 ms  2.128 ms  2.136 ms
 7  202.77.23.29 (202.77.23.29)  9.130 ms  9.159 ms  9.211 ms
 8  219.158.10.29 (219.158.10.29)  6.495 ms  6.471 ms  6.460 ms
 9  219.158.103.29 (219.158.103.29)  14.472 ms  14.489 ms  14.482 ms
10  * 219.158.103.217 (219.158.103.217)  23.346 ms *
11  219.158.12.2 (219.158.12.2)  39.071 ms  39.087 ms  38.554 ms
12  112.85.230.30 (112.85.230.30)  45.345 ms  45.283 ms  45.398 ms
13  * * *
14  112.85.218.150 (112.85.218.150)  46.272 ms  46.603 ms  46.600 ms

联通是回程直连

这是移动的回程

[root@Cloud ~]# traceroute 120.195.6.129
traceroute to 120.195.6.129 (120.195.6.129), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  185.207.154.1 (185.207.154.1)  0.506 ms  0.411 ms  0.397 ms
 2  10.84.1.254 (10.84.1.254)  0.569 ms  0.505 ms  0.498 ms
 3  202.97.25.229 (202.97.25.229)  28.456 ms  28.487 ms  28.483 ms
 4  202.97.33.125 (202.97.33.125)  46.194 ms 202.97.12.181 (202.97.12.181)  44.548 ms *
 5  202.97.57.26 (202.97.57.26)  30.821 ms  30.821 ms  31.037 ms
 6  202.97.84.86 (202.97.84.86)  34.729 ms 202.97.84.30 (202.97.84.30)  32.992 ms 202.97.92.2 (202.97.92.2)  32.813 ms
 7  * * *
 8  221.183.15.193 (221.183.15.193)  39.767 ms 221.183.66.201 (221.183.66.201)  40.794 ms 221.183.21.169 (221.183.21.169)  39.636 ms
 9  221.176.22.45 (221.176.22.45)  38.452 ms  43.129 ms  43.073 ms
10  * * *
11  6.30.207.183.static.js.chinamobile.com (183.207.30.6)  97.769 ms 190.25.207.183.static.js.chinamobile.com (183.207.25.190)  96.608 ms 38.20.207.183.static.js.chinamobile.com (183.207.20.38)  54.286 ms
12  120.195.42.122 (120.195.42.122)  54.246 ms  54.199 ms  54.887 ms
13  120.195.42.130 (120.195.42.130)  56.089 ms  54.210 ms  154.106 ms

移动先走电信163骨干网,然后再回移动路线

这是电信的回程

[root@Cloud ~]# traceroute 122.245.219.11
traceroute to 122.245.219.11 (122.245.219.11), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  185.207.154.1 (185.207.154.1)  0.598 ms  0.519 ms  0.507 ms
 2  10.84.1.254 (10.84.1.254)  0.556 ms  0.549 ms  0.538 ms
 3  10.1.3.4 (10.1.3.4)  2.057 ms  2.065 ms  2.069 ms
 4  10.1.3.10 (10.1.3.10)  7.086 ms  7.145 ms  7.124 ms
 5  63.140.7.13 (63.140.7.13)  1.809 ms  1.816 ms  1.830 ms
 6  59.43.246.181 (59.43.246.181)  101.742 ms 59.43.247.93 (59.43.247.93)  1.592 ms 59.43.247.85 (59.43.247.85)  2.043 ms
 7  59.43.183.77 (59.43.183.77)  30.147 ms 59.43.249.30 (59.43.249.30)  25.325 ms 59.43.188.229 (59.43.188.229)  25.838 ms
 8  59.43.246.253 (59.43.246.253)  28.959 ms 59.43.247.57 (59.43.247.57)  28.324 ms 59.43.187.61 (59.43.187.61)  31.818 ms
 9  59.43.130.197 (59.43.130.197)  27.652 ms 59.43.138.61 (59.43.138.61)  31.519 ms 59.43.130.205 (59.43.130.205)  35.950 ms
10  59.43.47.90 (59.43.47.90)  31.758 ms * *
11  59.43.117.170 (59.43.117.170)  45.251 ms * *
12  * * *
13  122.245.219.11 (122.245.219.11)  38.311 ms  44.251 ms  43.480 ms
[root@Cloud ~]# 

电信回程也是CN2

电信双程CN2 GIA

移动,联通直连

下面是unixbench成绩

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Mar 27 2020 10:48:10 - 11:16:21
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       28110520.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3469.6 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2846.0 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        403534.2 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          108576.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1052318.7 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              716980.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 152159.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               7312.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3548.1 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    456.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         613947.1 lps   (10.2 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   28110520.7   2408.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3469.6    630.8
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2846.0    661.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     403534.2   1019.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     108576.3    656.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1052318.7   1814.3
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     716980.2    576.4
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     152159.6    380.4
Process Creation                                126.0       7312.9    580.4
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3548.1    836.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        456.2    760.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     613947.1    409.3
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         765.4



======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

成绩不堪入目,才765分,vultr都比你好!

下面是没安装b b r的下载速度

2Mbps,跟官方说的差不多

下面是安装了b b r的下载速度

由于hostker安装了b b r后死机了,所以这一栏没有

下面是观看YT的速度

看这个,我都不敢用代理了

日本地区测试

东京地区

东京有2个区,推荐一区

它没用注明什么线路

那我就来康康

一区最低配置:1核 2G内存 40G硬盘 0.011K贝壳/小时 5M带宽 (≈79元/月)
二区最低配置:1核 2G内存 30G硬盘 0.011K贝壳/小时 5M带宽 (≈79元/月)

电信去程走的是软银路线

移动是直连

联通走软银

电信回程走普通路线

[root@Cloud ~]# traceroute 122.245.219.11
traceroute to 122.245.219.11 (122.245.219.11), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  103.27.186.1 (103.27.186.1)  1.304 ms  1.243 ms  1.253 ms
 2  10.0.52.1 (10.0.52.1)  0.244 ms  0.224 ms  0.236 ms
 3  core4.ge1-1-bbnet1.tok.pnap.net (61.211.160.15)  3.898 ms core4.ge4-1-bbnet2.tok.pnap.net (61.211.160.95)  3.848 ms core5.ge1-1-bbnet1.tok.pnap.net (61.211.160.16)  1.354 ms
 4  core4.ge4-1-bbnet2.tok.pnap.net (61.211.160.95)  3.826 ms 101.110.21.201 (101.110.21.201)  1.243 ms core4.ge1-1-bbnet1.tok.pnap.net (61.211.160.15)  4.200 ms
 5  * 101.110.21.201 (101.110.21.201)  1.199 ms  1.257 ms
 6  * 202.97.55.201 (202.97.55.201)  32.516 ms *
 7  * * *
 8  202.97.90.34 (202.97.90.34)  34.378 ms 202.97.24.185 (202.97.24.185)  47.008 ms 202.97.90.34 (202.97.90.34)  34.372 ms
 9  * * 202.97.82.6 (202.97.82.6)  49.771 ms
10  202.97.82.6 (202.97.82.6)  49.786 ms * 230.4.175.61.dial.nb.zj.dynamic.163data.com.cn (61.175.4.230)  39.887 ms
11  198.4.175.61.dial.nb.zj.dynamic.163data.com.cn (61.175.4.198)  54.438 ms 122.245.219.11 (122.245.219.11)  53.994 ms  54.011 ms
[root@Cloud ~]# 

移动回程走IIJ线路

[root@Cloud ~]# traceroute 120.195.6.129
traceroute to 120.195.6.129 (120.195.6.129), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  103.27.186.1 (103.27.186.1)  1.344 ms  1.351 ms  1.354 ms
 2  10.0.52.1 (10.0.52.1)  0.407 ms  0.437 ms  0.431 ms
 3  core5.ge4-1-bbnet2.tok.pnap.net (61.211.160.96)  1.250 ms core4.ge4-1-bbnet2.tok.pnap.net (61.211.160.95)  1.291 ms core5.ge4-1-bbnet2.tok.pnap.net (61.211.160.96)  1.279 ms
 4  mpr2.vlan-3-bbnet1.tok003.pnap.net (61.211.160.23)  1.396 ms mpr2.vlan-2-bbnet2.tok003.pnap.net (61.211.160.84)  1.572 ms  1.570 ms
 5  202.232.6.45 (202.232.6.45)  2.887 ms  2.932 ms  2.975 ms
 6  tky009bb00.IIJ.Net (58.138.112.213)  3.202 ms tky009bb01.IIJ.Net (58.138.112.217)  2.914 ms  2.827 ms
 7  tky001bb11.IIJ.Net (58.138.80.157)  3.025 ms tky001bb10.IIJ.Net (58.138.88.9)  3.177 ms tky001bb11.IIJ.Net (58.138.80.157)  12.371 ms
 8  tky001ix15.IIJ.Net (58.138.102.214)  2.022 ms  2.104 ms tky001ix15.IIJ.Net (58.138.101.10)  2.646 ms
 9  202.232.8.190 (202.232.8.190)  2.680 ms  2.694 ms  2.755 ms
10  221.183.21.197 (221.183.21.197)  77.684 ms 221.183.21.209 (221.183.21.209)  67.624 ms 221.183.21.197 (221.183.21.197)  77.803 ms
11  221.176.22.205 (221.176.22.205)  99.173 ms  87.785 ms *
12  221.176.20.89 (221.176.20.89)  79.453 ms  91.274 ms  89.904 ms
13  221.183.18.26 (221.183.18.26)  81.819 ms  81.779 ms 221.183.18.30 (221.183.18.30)  81.549 ms
14  190.25.207.183.static.js.chinamobile.com (183.207.25.190)  107.561 ms 6.30.207.183.static.js.chinamobile.com (183.207.30.6)  107.996 ms 142.29.207.183.static.js.chinamobile.com (183.207.29.142)  97.109 ms
15  120.195.42.122 (120.195.42.122)  117.058 ms  107.435 ms  116.026 ms
16  * 120.195.42.130 (120.195.42.130)  113.913 ms  113.800 ms
17  * * *
18  120.195.6.129 (120.195.6.129)  84.505 ms  85.215 ms  85.752 ms
[root@Cloud ~]# 

联通回程走软银线路

[root@Cloud ~]# traceroute 112.85.231.129
traceroute to 112.85.231.129 (112.85.231.129), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  103.27.186.1 (103.27.186.1)  3.955 ms  3.850 ms  3.864 ms
 2  10.0.52.1 (10.0.52.1)  0.677 ms  0.702 ms  0.706 ms
 3  core5.ge1-1-bbnet1.tok.pnap.net (61.211.160.16)  1.899 ms  1.930 ms core4.ge1-1-bbnet1.tok.pnap.net (61.211.160.15)  1.906 ms
 4  101.110.21.201 (101.110.21.201)  1.577 ms  1.782 ms  1.593 ms
 5  softbank221111202010.bbtec.net (221.111.202.10)  36.687 ms 101.110.21.201 (101.110.21.201)  1.844 ms softbank221111202010.bbtec.net (221.111.202.10)  36.672 ms
 6  softbank221111202010.bbtec.net (221.111.202.10)  36.681 ms 219.158.113.138 (219.158.113.138)  34.900 ms softbank221111202010.bbtec.net (221.111.202.10)  36.043 ms
 7  219.158.113.105 (219.158.113.105)  35.670 ms 219.158.113.138 (219.158.113.138)  42.210 ms 219.158.113.105 (219.158.113.105)  34.776 ms
 8  219.158.113.105 (219.158.113.105)  34.658 ms 219.158.18.2 (219.158.18.2)  44.029 ms 219.158.113.105 (219.158.113.105)  34.525 ms
 9  112.85.230.42 (112.85.230.42)  45.378 ms  45.647 ms  45.189 ms
10  112.85.230.42 (112.85.230.42)  45.513 ms 122.194.150.50 (122.194.150.50)  64.350 ms 112.85.230.42 (112.85.230.42)  44.726 ms
11  122.194.150.50 (122.194.150.50)  64.822 ms 221.6.208.206 (221.6.208.206)  60.925 ms 122.194.150.190 (122.194.150.190)  63.143 ms
12  112.85.218.150 (112.85.218.150)  46.829 ms  47.020 ms  46.910 ms

总结:电信去程软银回程163骨干网,移动去程直连回程IIJ,联通双程软银

下面是ping测试

速度还行,推荐联通电信入手

移动的换宽带吧~

附一组我本地ping的结果(宁波电信晚高峰)

C:\Users\21048>ping 103.27.186.59

正在 Ping 103.27.186.59 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 103.27.186.59 的回复: 字节=32 时间=82ms TTL=52
来自 103.27.186.59 的回复: 字节=32 时间=57ms TTL=52
来自 103.27.186.59 的回复: 字节=32 时间=77ms TTL=52
来自 103.27.186.59 的回复: 字节=32 时间=44ms TTL=52

103.27.186.59 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 4,丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失),
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 44ms,最长 = 82ms,平均 = 65ms

C:\Users\21048>

下面是Hostker日本东京一区的硬件配置

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU 型号             : Common KVM processor
CPU 核心数           : 1
CPU 频率             : 2199.998 MHz
总硬盘大小           : 40.0 GB (0.8 GB Used)
总内存大小           : 2005 MB (257 MB Used)
SWAP大小             : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
开机时长             : 0 days, 0 hour 20 min
系统负载             : 0.08, 0.02, 0.01
系统                 : CentOS 6.10
架构                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
内核                 : 2.6.32-754.11.1.el6.x86_64
虚拟化平台           : kvm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
硬盘I/O (第一次测试) : 134 MB/s
硬盘I/O (第二次测试) : 107 MB/s
硬盘I/O (第三次测试) : 75.1 MB/s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
节点名称                  IP地址            下载速度            延迟      
CacheFly                  204.93.150.152    18.3MB/s            73.737 ms   
Linode, Tokyo, JP                                                ms         
Linode, Singapore, SG     139.162.23.4      2.40MB/s            70.054 ms   
Linode, London, UK        176.58.107.39     1.30MB/s            237.231 ms  
Linode, Frankfurt, DE     139.162.130.8     1.44MB/s            262.039 ms  
Linode, Fremont, CA       50.116.14.9       2.11MB/s            106.316 ms  
Softlayer, Dallas, TX     173.192.68.18     2.44MB/s            134.814 ms  
Softlayer, Seattle, WA    67.228.112.250    4.22MB/s            114.051 ms  
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE  159.122.69.4      1.78MB/s            232.763 ms  
Softlayer, Singapore, SG  119.81.28.170     2.54MB/s            84.773 ms   
Softlayer, HongKong, CN   119.81.130.170    8.38MB/s            53.445 ms   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
节点名称                  上传速度          下载速度            延迟      
上海电信                  3.03 Mbit/s       77.60 Mbit/s        95.218 ms  
西安电信                  5.44 Mbit/s       69.67 Mbit/s        166.375 ms 
北京联通                  5.61 Mbit/s       18.42 Mbit/s        95.756 ms  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
合肥        : 41.64 ms   北京        : 58.43 ms   武汉        : 96.5 ms    
昌吉        : Fail       成都        : Fail       上海        : Fail       
太原        : 106.28 ms  杭州        : 51.49 ms   宁夏        : 115.56 ms  
呼和浩特    : 76.5 ms    南昌        : Fail       拉萨        : Fail       
乌鲁木齐    : 121.73 ms  天津        : 72.86 ms   襄阳        : Fail       
郑州        : 99.24 ms   沈阳        : Fail       兰州        : 120.69 ms  
哈尔滨      : Fail       宁波        : Fail       苏州        : Fail       
济南        : 55.44 ms   西安        : 107.9 ms   西宁        : Fail       
重庆        : 148.78 ms  深圳        : Fail       南京        : Fail       
长沙        : Fail       长春        : 70.36 ms   福州        : 55.67 ms   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

下面是UnixBench成绩

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Fri Mar 27 2020 18:15:57 - 18:43:50
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       23454048.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2527.6 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2254.6 lps   (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        362282.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           96401.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1054725.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              607279.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 141205.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               5916.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3064.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    410.6 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         574141.6 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   23454048.5   2009.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2527.6    459.6
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2254.6    524.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     362282.4    914.9
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      96401.5    582.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1054725.8   1818.5
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     607279.3    488.2
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     141205.0    353.0
Process Creation                                126.0       5916.1    469.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3064.2    722.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        410.6    684.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     574141.6    382.8
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         662.8



======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

662.8分,差不多

网速测试

这是没安装b b r 的速度

晚高峰,速度欠佳

注:B B R不安装了,CentOS6这个重启了之后死机

大阪地区

它的介绍是大阪走软银路线

我来康康

大阪的最低配置是

1核 2G内存 30G硬盘 0.010K贝壳/小时 5M带宽 (≈72元/月)

好了

我们开始评测

电信去程软银到大阪

移动绕道香港软银到大阪

联通软银直连

接下来是回程测试

电信回程也是软银线路

[root@cloud ~]# traceroute 122.245.211.181
traceroute to 122.245.211.181 (122.245.211.181), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  gateway (45.117.101.1)  0.533 ms  0.500 ms  0.474 ms
 2  10.254.101.1 (10.254.101.1)  0.504 ms  0.496 ms  0.486 ms
 3  mpr5.PortChannel10.xtom-1.osk001.pnap.net (203.95.25.241)  0.467 ms  0.451 ms  0.440 ms
 4  mpr6.bbnet2.osk001.pnap.net (203.95.24.66)  0.565 ms  0.540 ms  0.525 ms
 5  165.76.181.29 (165.76.181.29)  1.878 ms  1.792 ms  1.855 ms
 6  * * *
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  softbank221111202018.bbtec.net (221.111.202.18)  27.224 ms * *
10  202.97.70.17 (202.97.70.17)  30.159 ms 202.97.55.201 (202.97.55.201)  33.006 ms  33.470 ms
11  202.97.12.198 (202.97.12.198)  27.447 ms 202.97.74.2 (202.97.74.2)  35.870 ms 202.97.35.85 (202.97.35.85)  27.363 ms
12  202.97.62.101 (202.97.62.101)  39.313 ms 202.97.62.113 (202.97.62.113)  38.619 ms 202.97.57.26 (202.97.57.26)  47.213 ms
13  * 202.97.26.18 (202.97.26.18)  45.814 ms 202.97.82.22 (202.97.82.22)  44.204 ms
14  198.4.175.61.dial.nb.zj.dynamic.163data.com.cn (61.175.4.198)  46.916 ms  46.871 ms  47.117 ms
15  122.245.211.181 (122.245.211.181)  56.877 ms  58.978 ms  56.868 ms
[root@cloud ~]# 

移动回程是IIJ线路

[root@cloud ~]# traceroute 120.195.6.129
traceroute to 120.195.6.129 (120.195.6.129), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  gateway (45.117.101.1)  0.332 ms  0.300 ms  0.286 ms
 2  10.254.101.1 (10.254.101.1)  0.551 ms  0.542 ms  0.536 ms
 3  mpr5.PortChannel10.xtom-1.osk001.pnap.net (203.95.25.241)  0.508 ms  0.496 ms  0.487 ms
 4  210.130.133.237 (210.130.133.237)  1.418 ms  1.453 ms  1.362 ms
 5  osk004ipgw00.IIJ.Net (58.138.106.201)  3.505 ms  3.486 ms  3.462 ms
 6  osk004bb01.IIJ.Net (58.138.106.13)  2.052 ms  1.844 ms osk004bb01.IIJ.Net (58.138.106.137)  1.970 ms
 7  tky001bb10.IIJ.Net (58.138.98.221)  7.583 ms tky001bb10.IIJ.Net (58.138.88.17)  7.347 ms tky001bb11.IIJ.Net (58.138.98.225)  9.543 ms
 8  tky001ix15.IIJ.Net (58.138.102.210)  7.670 ms tky001ix15.IIJ.Net (58.138.101.14)  11.827 ms tky001ix15.IIJ.Net (58.138.102.210)  7.650 ms
 9  202.232.8.190 (202.232.8.190)  8.220 ms  8.201 ms  8.273 ms
10  221.183.21.197 (221.183.21.197)  92.141 ms  92.104 ms 221.183.21.209 (221.183.21.209)  76.644 ms
11  221.176.22.205 (221.176.22.205)  94.408 ms  85.777 ms  84.728 ms
12  221.176.20.89 (221.176.20.89)  100.598 ms  137.632 ms *
13  221.183.14.38 (221.183.14.38)  101.102 ms 221.183.14.70 (221.183.14.70)  99.427 ms 221.183.19.162 (221.183.19.162)  100.156 ms
14  142.29.207.183.static.js.chinamobile.com (183.207.29.142)  103.743 ms  113.709 ms 6.30.207.183.static.js.chinamobile.com (183.207.30.6)  121.310 ms
15  120.195.42.122 (120.195.42.122)  124.984 ms  112.726 ms  124.598 ms
16  120.195.42.130 (120.195.42.130)  112.545 ms  123.410 ms  112.066 ms

联通回程是软银线路

[root@cloud ~]# traceroute 112.85.231.129
traceroute to 112.85.231.129 (112.85.231.129), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  gateway (45.117.101.1)  0.831 ms  0.835 ms  0.807 ms
 2  10.254.101.1 (10.254.101.1)  0.763 ms  0.755 ms  0.743 ms
 3  mpr5.PortChannel10.xtom-1.osk001.pnap.net (203.95.25.241)  0.710 ms  0.623 ms  0.583 ms
 4  mpr6.bbnet1.osk001.pnap.net (203.95.24.2)  2.426 ms  2.445 ms  0.539 ms
 5  165.76.181.29 (165.76.181.29)  3.759 ms  1.748 ms  3.759 ms
 6  * * *
 7  * * *
 8  * * *
 9  softbank221111202046.bbtec.net (221.111.202.46)  32.018 ms  28.784 ms  30.525 ms
10  219.158.113.142 (219.158.113.142)  34.424 ms  34.409 ms  34.407 ms
11  219.158.113.101 (219.158.113.101)  29.079 ms  28.127 ms  29.572 ms
12  219.158.18.2 (219.158.18.2)  36.805 ms  35.579 ms  39.480 ms
13  112.85.230.106 (112.85.230.106)  48.016 ms  48.018 ms  48.929 ms
14  * * *
15  112.85.218.150 (112.85.218.150)  50.216 ms  49.567 ms  49.589 ms

下面是Hostker日本大阪的配置

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU 型号             : Common KVM processor
CPU 核心数           : 1
CPU 频率             : 2493.990 MHz
总硬盘大小           : 30.0 GB (1.4 GB Used)
总内存大小           : 1838 MB (164 MB Used)
SWAP大小             : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
开机时长             : 0 days, 0 hour 32 min
系统负载             : 0.86, 0.20, 0.10
系统                 : CentOS 7.6.1810
架构                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
内核                 : 3.10.0-957.10.1.el7.x86_64
虚拟化平台           : kvm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
硬盘I/O (第一次测试) : 186 MB/s
硬盘I/O (第二次测试) : 215 MB/s
硬盘I/O (第三次测试) : 209 MB/s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
节点名称                  IP地址            下载速度            延迟      
CacheFly                  204.93.150.152    30.3MB/s            74.563 ms   
Linode, Tokyo, JP                                                ms         
Linode, Singapore, SG     139.162.23.4      33.1MB/s            68.765 ms   
Linode, London, UK        176.58.107.39     9.41MB/s            236.298 ms  
Linode, Frankfurt, DE     139.162.130.8     7.14MB/s            270.518 ms  
Linode, Fremont, CA       50.116.14.9       13.1MB/s            112.845 ms  
Softlayer, Dallas, TX     173.192.68.18     11.6MB/s            154.093 ms  
Softlayer, Seattle, WA    67.228.112.250    17.0MB/s            108.007 ms  
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE  159.122.69.4      6.56MB/s            259.195 ms  
Softlayer, Singapore, SG  119.81.28.170     19.8MB/s            89.934 ms   
Softlayer, HongKong, CN   119.81.130.170    15.6MB/s            53.793 ms   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
节点名称                  上传速度          下载速度            延迟      
上海电信                  5.32 Mbit/s       164.50 Mbit/s       91.093 ms  
西安电信                  5.74 Mbit/s       170.29 Mbit/s       158.287 ms 
北京联通                  5.50 Mbit/s       181.81 Mbit/s       125.953 ms 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
合肥        : 73.5 ms    北京        : 71.64 ms   武汉        : 72.55 ms   
昌吉        : Fail       成都        : Fail       上海        : Fail       
太原        : 121.2 ms   杭州        : 30.38 ms   宁夏        : 123.97 ms  
呼和浩特    : 88.62 ms   南昌        : Fail       拉萨        : Fail       
乌鲁木齐    : 113.75 ms  天津        : 67.54 ms   襄阳        : Fail       
郑州        : 61.26 ms   沈阳        : Fail       兰州        : 68.82 ms   
哈尔滨      : Fail       宁波        : Fail       苏州        : Fail       
济南        : 62.28 ms   西安        : 87.94 ms   西宁        : Fail       
重庆        : 147.59 ms  深圳        : Fail       南京        : Fail       
长沙        : Fail       长春        : 68.32 ms   福州        : 91.99 ms   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

下面是unixbench成绩

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Mar 28 2020 19:08:45 - 19:36:54
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       29864881.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3823.5 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2487.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        405503.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks          109530.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1122244.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              587683.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  96728.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               6722.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   3563.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    475.0 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         567695.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   29864881.8   2559.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3823.5    695.2
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2487.8    578.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     405503.6   1024.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0     109530.1    661.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1122244.4   1934.9
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     587683.3    472.4
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      96728.2    241.8
Process Creation                                126.0       6722.5    533.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       3563.3    840.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        475.0    791.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     567695.1    378.5
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         723.9



======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 


[root@cloud ~]# 

老样子

下面是下载的速度(晚高峰,没安装b b r)


速度欠佳

下面是下载的速度(晚高峰,安装b b r)

速度可以上2mbps

美国洛杉矶测试

下面我们来评测洛杉矶的

官方介绍:洛杉矶机房,CN2路线,我们来康康

最低配置

1核 1G内存 25G硬盘 0.005K贝壳/小时 500M带宽 (≈36元/月)

电信去程CN2 GT

联通去程直连

移动去程直连

下面是回程

电信仍然是CN2 GT

[root@hostker ~]# traceroute 122.245.211.181
traceroute to 122.245.211.181 (122.245.211.181), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  cloud-gw.hostker.net (173.254.200.65)  393.406 ms  392.983 ms  393.013 ms
 2  colo-lax9.as8100.net (96.44.180.1)  0.284 ms  0.422 ms  0.331 ms
 3  96.44.163.153.static.quadranet.com (96.44.163.153)  0.312 ms  0.274 ms  0.610 ms
 4  218.30.48.145 (218.30.48.145)  1.436 ms  1.488 ms  1.571 ms
 5  59.43.182.89 (59.43.182.89)  127.861 ms 59.43.246.237 (59.43.246.237)  127.556 ms  127.504 ms
 6  59.43.244.118 (59.43.244.118)  131.804 ms  131.597 ms  131.549 ms
 7  * * *
 8  * 202.97.57.146 (202.97.57.146)  134.747 ms  134.653 ms
 9  202.97.68.138 (202.97.68.138)  137.457 ms *  135.890 ms
10  61.153.116.226 (61.153.116.226)  143.927 ms 230.4.175.61.dial.nb.zj.dynamic.163data.com.cn (61.175.4.230)  145.200 ms 226.4.175.61.dial.nb.zj.dynamic.163data.com.cn (61.175.4.226)  252.742 ms
11  * 122.245.211.181 (122.245.211.181)  149.723 ms *
[root@hostker ~]# 

移动回程直连

[root@hostker ~]# traceroute 120.195.6.129
traceroute to 120.195.6.129 (120.195.6.129), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  * * *
 2  96.44.180.12 (96.44.180.12)  0.424 ms  0.423 ms  0.410 ms
 3  96.44.163.152.static.quadranet.com (96.44.163.152)  0.310 ms  0.512 ms  0.314 ms
 4  223.119.64.245 (223.119.64.245)  0.892 ms  0.926 ms  1.007 ms
 5  223.120.6.17 (223.120.6.17)  0.768 ms  0.762 ms  0.738 ms
 6  223.120.6.126 (223.120.6.126)  0.884 ms 223.120.6.2 (223.120.6.2)  0.992 ms 223.120.6.126 (223.120.6.126)  1.050 ms
 7  223.120.12.18 (223.120.12.18)  180.860 ms  180.868 ms  181.026 ms
 8  221.183.55.46 (221.183.55.46)  199.971 ms  199.490 ms  198.659 ms
 9  221.183.25.189 (221.183.25.189)  207.273 ms * *
10  221.176.20.89 (221.176.20.89)  225.373 ms * *
11  * * 221.183.14.38 (221.183.14.38)  203.550 ms
12  * 6.30.207.183.static.js.chinamobile.com (183.207.30.6)  250.089 ms 190.25.207.183.static.js.chinamobile.com (183.207.25.190)  220.183 ms
13  120.195.42.122 (120.195.42.122)  217.325 ms *  215.290 ms
14  * * 120.195.42.130 (120.195.42.130)  214.791 ms
15  120.195.42.130 (120.195.42.130)  221.396 ms * *

联通直连

[root@hostker ~]# traceroute 112.85.231.129
traceroute to 112.85.231.129 (112.85.231.129), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
 1  * * *
 2  colo-lax9.as8100.net (96.44.180.5)  0.442 ms  0.402 ms  0.491 ms
 3  96.44.163.152.static.quadranet.com (96.44.163.152)  0.299 ms  0.356 ms  0.313 ms
 4  china.unicom (204.152.204.2)  0.835 ms  0.996 ms  0.988 ms
 5  207.254.191.125 (207.254.191.125)  5.604 ms 207.254.191.102 (207.254.191.102)  1.348 ms  1.318 ms
 6  219.158.98.49 (219.158.98.49)  163.398 ms  163.274 ms 219.158.98.17 (219.158.98.17)  153.131 ms
 7  219.158.16.81 (219.158.16.81)  147.155 ms 219.158.103.29 (219.158.103.29)  165.631 ms  165.630 ms
 8  219.158.4.169 (219.158.4.169)  179.288 ms  179.024 ms 219.158.8.117 (219.158.8.117)  186.711 ms
 9  219.158.20.238 (219.158.20.238)  202.952 ms 219.158.20.202 (219.158.20.202)  206.088 ms 219.158.20.238 (219.158.20.238)  202.675 ms
10  112.85.230.106 (112.85.230.106)  203.026 ms  223.786 ms  217.852 ms
11  * * *
12  112.85.218.150 (112.85.218.150)  217.084 ms  218.111 ms  212.022 ms

总结:电信双线CN2 GT,移动电信双线直连

下面是ping的速度

美国CN2能做到这样还是不错的~

附一组我本地ping的结果(晚高峰时期)

C:\Users\21048>ping 173.254.200.89

正在 Ping 173.254.200.89 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 173.254.200.89 的回复: 字节=32 时间=142ms TTL=52
来自 173.254.200.89 的回复: 字节=32 时间=164ms TTL=52
请求超时。
来自 173.254.200.89 的回复: 字节=32 时间=147ms TTL=52

173.254.200.89 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4,已接收 = 3,丢失 = 1 (25% 丢失),
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 142ms,最长 = 164ms,平均 = 151ms

C:\Users\21048>

下面是Hostker洛杉矶服务器的配置

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
CPU 型号             : QEMU Virtual CPU version (cpu64-rhel6)
CPU 核心数           : 1
CPU 频率             : 2261.134 MHz
总硬盘大小           : 25.0 GB (1.3 GB Used)
总内存大小           : 968 MB (135 MB Used)
SWAP大小             : 0 MB (0 MB Used)
开机时长             : 0 days, 0 hour 12 min
系统负载             : 1.49, 0.35, 0.15
系统                 : CentOS 7.4.1708
架构                 : x86_64 (64 Bit)
内核                 : 3.10.0-693.21.1.el7.x86_64
虚拟化平台           : kvm
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
硬盘I/O (第一次测试) : 51.6 MB/s
硬盘I/O (第二次测试) : 48.8 MB/s
硬盘I/O (第三次测试) : 62.2 MB/s
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
节点名称                  IP地址            下载速度            延迟      
CacheFly                  205.234.175.175   44.5MB/s            0.441 ms    
Linode, Tokyo, JP                                                ms         
Linode, Singapore, SG     139.162.23.4      4.58MB/s            174.955 ms  
Linode, London, UK        176.58.107.39     6.11MB/s            139.792 ms  
Linode, Frankfurt, DE     139.162.130.8     6.54MB/s            146.179 ms  
Linode, Fremont, CA       50.116.14.9       31.7MB/s            14.580 ms   
Softlayer, Dallas, TX     173.192.68.18     26.4MB/s            34.885 ms   
Softlayer, Seattle, WA    67.228.112.250    28.5MB/s            28.627 ms   
Softlayer, Frankfurt, DE  159.122.69.4      5.70MB/s            148.389 ms  
Softlayer, Singapore, SG  119.81.28.170     8.08MB/s            183.277 ms  
Softlayer, HongKong, CN   119.81.130.170    9.30MB/s            161.548 ms  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
节点名称                  上传速度          下载速度            延迟      
上海电信                  0.79 Mbit/s       41.94 Mbit/s        459.826 ms 
西安电信                  10.65 Mbit/s      59.02 Mbit/s        312.059 ms 
北京联通                  5.33 Mbit/s       73.12 Mbit/s        336.995 ms 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
合肥        : 226.27 ms  北京        : 161.22 ms  武汉        : 192.09 ms  
昌吉        : Fail       成都        : Fail       上海        : Fail       
太原        : 0.63 ms    杭州        : 144.49 ms  宁夏        : 242.76 ms  
呼和浩特    : 180.28 ms  南昌        : Fail       拉萨        : Fail       
乌鲁木齐    : 229.73 ms  天津        : 165.92 ms  襄阳        : Fail       
郑州        : 228.81 ms  沈阳        : Fail       兰州        : Fail       
哈尔滨      : Fail       宁波        : Fail       苏州        : Fail       
济南        : 211.02 ms  西安        : 197.5 ms   西宁        : Fail       
重庆        : 216.47 ms  深圳        : Fail       南京        : Fail       
长沙        : Fail       长春        : 220.96 ms  福州        : 235.58 ms  
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

差不多

下面是Hostker洛杉矶服务器的UnixBench成绩

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sat Mar 28 2020 19:52:45 - 20:21:03
1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       18868592.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     2629.9 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1047.5 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        108714.1 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           29806.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        348951.4 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              172479.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  45148.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               3718.1 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   1626.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    217.0 lpm   (60.2 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         168169.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   18868592.1   1616.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       2629.9    478.2
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1047.5    243.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     108714.1    274.5
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      29806.8    180.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     348951.4    601.6
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     172479.3    138.6
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      45148.0    112.9
Process Creation                                126.0       3718.1    295.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       1626.9    383.7
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        217.0    361.6
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     168169.5    112.1
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         293.1



======= Script description and score comparison completed! ======= 

293分,渣

下面是Hostker的下载速度(没安装b b r)

晚高峰,CN2 GT稳定性差

下面是Hostker的下载速度(安装b b r)

哎呀,不小心手欠删除了,惨了www

耗时2天,终于完成!


科技为主,游戏为辅。技术肥宅,喜欢看番。